A court-ordered equitable remedy requiring a party to perform a certain act, often - but not always - as a result of breach of a contract?

A court-ordered equitable remedy requiring a party to perform a certain act, often - but not always - as a result of breach of a contract?

• A. Injunction
• B. Conditional contract
• C. Specific performance
• D. Liquidated damages

Answer: (C)

This question hinges on the remedy that compels a party to fulfill a contractual duty. The remedy that requires someone to perform what the contract promised is specific performance. Courts use it when monetary damages would not adequately compensate for the breach, often because the subject matter is unique (like real estate or a unique item) and a dollar amount can’t replace the promised performance. In contrast, an injunction is primarily about stopping or preventing action, not enforcing a contract’s promises. Liquidated damages are pre-agreed monetary amounts to be paid for breach, not an order to perform. A conditional contract describes conditions for performance, not the remedy itself.

This question hinges on the remedy that compels a party to fulfill a contractual duty. The remedy that requires someone to perform what the contract promised is specific performance. Courts use it when monetary damages would not adequately compensate for the breach, often because the subject matter is unique (like real estate or a unique item) and a dollar amount can’t replace the promised performance. In contrast, an injunction is primarily about stopping or preventing action, not enforcing a contract’s promises. Liquidated damages are pre-agreed monetary amounts to be paid for breach, not an order to perform. A conditional contract describes conditions for performance, not the remedy itself.